Let us be honest from the start: astrology is not physics, and no one has proven in a laboratory that a distant planet 'causes' a trait of your character. That said, millions of people across all cultures and eras feel that something there works. What is proposed to explain it? Let us go over the ideas, from the most earthly to the most frontier, without buying into them or dismissing them in advance.
The psychological explanation: mirrors and archetypes
The most accepted reading is symbolic. The psychiatrist Carl Jung, who studied astrology seriously, saw it as a map of archetypes: universal figures of the psyche (the mother, the warrior, the sage) projected onto the sky. Under this view, the chart does not predict, it reflects. It gives you a language to recognize patterns that were already in you.
Skepticism has its strong card here: the Barnum effect, that tendency to feel as your own a vague description that in truth fits almost everyone. It is real and worth keeping in mind. But it also explains why generic magazine astrology feels hollow, and why a specific reading, based on your exact chart, feels different: the more precise, the less Barnum.
Synchronicity
Jung proposed another, bolder idea: synchronicity, meaningful coincidences that are not explained by cause and effect. From there, the sky and your life are not that one moves the other, but that both are part of one same meaningful moment. 'As above, so below', the ancients said. It is a philosophical hypothesis, not verifiable, but elegant.
The frontiers: magnetism, cycles and the imprint of the sky
Here we enter speculative terrain, and it is worth saying it clearly: what follows are ideas that are debated, not established facts. The Earth has a geomagnetic field that varies, and we know certain organisms perceive it. Some propose that the state of the cosmo-magnetic environment at the moment of birth could leave a kind of 'imprint' on a nervous system that is only just beginning. It is a seductive idea and without solid proof yet, but not absurd: science has already accepted that seasonal light at birth influences biology.
In fact, chronobiology has documented that the month of birth correlates with real differences in health, temperament and even levels of certain neurotransmitters, due to the light, the temperature and the mother's diet according to the season. Astrology says something related in a more ancient language: that the moment of the year in which you arrive marks you. The difference is the vocabulary.
There is also the Gauquelin case: a French statistician who, seeking to debunk astrology, found a persistent correlation between the position of Mars at birth and elite sports careers. The finding was debated for decades and still has no clean resolution. It does not prove astrology, but it is a reminder that the subject is more slippery than either side would like.
The mature thing is neither to believe everything nor to dismiss everything, but to hold the question with curiosity.
So, does it work?
It depends on what you ask of it. As predictive physics, there is no evidence. As a symbolic language to know yourself, reflect and give shape to your experience, for many people it works very well, and that is also a piece of data. At Astradual we choose that door: astrology as a mirror of the soul, written with depth and with respect for your own freedom to interpret. Look at what is said, test it in yourself, and keep what serves you.